• Written by Ian Musgrave, Senior lecturer in Pharmacology, University of Adelaide
There's no need to be put off using sunscreen. From shutterstock.com

A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has attracted widespread media attention after it found chemicals contained in sunscreen could get into people’s bloodstreams:

A variety of different chemicals in sunscreen are used to absorb or scatter UV light – both long wavelength (UVA) and short wavelength (UVB) – to protect us from the harmful effects of the Sun.

Read more: Explainer: how does sunscreen work, what is SPF and can I still tan with it on?

But while small amounts of these chemicals may enter the bloodsteam, there is no evidence they are harmful. Ultimately, using sunscreen reduces your risk of skin cancer, and this study gives us no reason to stop using it.

Why was the study done?

The US Federal Drug Administration (FDA) recently updated its guidelines on sunscreen safety. The guidelines indicate that if long-term users were likely to have a plasma concentration of greater than 0.5 nanograms per millilitre of blood, further safety studies would need to be undertaken.

This level is just a trigger for investigation; it does not indicate whether the chemical has any actual toxic effect.

The JAMA study was done to determine whether commonly used sunscreen compounds exceeded these limits, which would indicate that further safety studies were required under the new guidelines.

So what did the study do?

The study looked at the absorption of some common organic sunscreen ingredients (avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and ecamsule), in 24 healthy participants after they applied four commercially available sunscreen formulations.

Each formulation contained three of the four organic sunscreen ingredients listed above. The concentrations of each individual compound were typical of commercial sunscreens and well within the permitted levels. For example, they all contained 3% avobenzone, and the maximum permitted concentration is 5%.

The researchers split the participants into four groups: two groups used a spray, one used cream, and the other used a lotion. The participants applied their assigned product to 75% of their body four times a day, for four days.

The researchers then examined the absorption of these compounds by measuring participants’ blood over seven days using highly sensitive tests.

What did they find?

In all subjects, the blood levels of the sunscreen chemicals rapidly rose above the FDA guidance levels regardless of the sunscreen formulation (spray, lotion or cream).

The levels remained above the FDA guidance levels for at least two days.

But the conditions of the test were extreme. Some 75% of body surface was covered, and the sunscreen was reapplied every two hours and under conditions where the compounds were unlikely to be broken down or removed (for example by swimming or sweating).

Sunscreen comes off in the water. Xolodan/Shutterstock

This was deliberately a test of a worst-case scenario, as mandated by FDA guidelines to determine whether safety testing was needed.

Of course, going above the FDA guidance levels does not indicate there is a risk; only that evaluation is required.

What about in Australia?

Australia’s FDA-equivalent body uses the European Union’s “non-clinical” guidelines to evaluate sunscreens and ensure they are safe to use.

The EU guidelines are based on several studies which show the components of sunscreens are not poisonous or harmful to human health.

Looking specifically at the chemical avobenzone, the safety studies show no toxic effect or potential harm to human health, aside from a small risk of skin sensitivity.

The level of avobenzone reported in the blood after regularly applying sunscreen, (around 4 nanograms per millilitre) is around 1,000 times lower than the threshold levels for harm to skin cells. And the safety studies report no increased risk for cancer.

European researchers have also investigated whether the chemicals in sunscreens can mimic the effects of the female sex hormone estrogen. They found the levels would have to be 100 times higher than are absorbed during normal sunscreen use to have any effect.

The bottom line

This study found that under a worst case scenario, blood levels of organic sunscreen chemicals exceeded the FDA guidance threshold. Under more realistic use the levels will be even lower.

But even under this worst case scenario, the levels are at least 100 times below the European Union’s safety threshold.

Given the known safety margins and the proven ability of sunscreen to prevent skin cancer, there is no reason to avoid or reduce your sunscreen use. – Ian Musgrave

Blind peer review

The research check is a fair and reasonable summary and interpretation of the JAMA paper on the absorption of active sunscreen ingredients.

It is worth noting that the reference to “extreme” conditions in which the research was conducted is correct, however, in terms of dose, it does align with the recommended level of use of sunscreen. That is, reapply every two hours and use 2mg per 1cm₂. A single “dose” is recommended at 5ml for each arm, leg, front torso, back and head and face, or 7 x 5 = 35ml.

Four such doses suggest each subject would have applied 140ml of sunscreen each day; more than a full 110ml tube, which is a common package size for sunscreen in Australia. This is extremely unlikely to occur. Most people use half or less of the recommended dose per application, and few reapply. Even fewer do so four times in a day. – Terry Slevin

Read more: There's insufficient evidence your sunscreen harms coral reefs

Research Checks interrogate newly published studies and how they’re reported in the media. The analysis is undertaken by one or more academics not involved with the study, and reviewed by another, to make sure it’s accurate.

Ian Musgrave is an associate member of the Forensic & Clinical Toxicology Association. He has previously received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council to study adverse reactions to herbal medicines and has previously been funded by the Australian Research Council to study potential natural product treatments for Alzheimer's disease. He has collaborated with SA water on studies of cyanobacterial toxins and their implication for drinking water quality. He has consulted pro bono with SA health and the SA consumer protection department on unrelated toxicological issues.

Terry Slevin is CEO of the Public Health Association of Australia. In a previous role at Cancer Council WA he has administered cancer prevention programs funded through the WA and Australian governments, some of which were funded through the National Partnership Agreement on Preventive Health. He has worked on many public health and cancer control programs and research projects funded by state and federal government agencies.

Authors: Ian Musgrave, Senior lecturer in Pharmacology, University of Adelaide

Read more http://theconversation.com/research-check-should-we-be-worried-that-the-chemicals-from-sunscreen-can-get-into-our-blood-116738

10 Signs You Need To Replace Your Windows

No doubt, it is impossible to talk to your home, but it gives you some clear signs when something is wrong with it. However, your home windows can be communicative, and they better explain what they...

News Company - avatar News Company

Need a doctor at your home? Here are your options

There are many valid reasons that health experts make home visits. It is a fact that many family doctors are concerned about repayments if they make too many home visits. This matter regulates diffe...

News Company - avatar News Company

We found the world's oldest asteroid strike in Western Australia. It might have triggered a global thaw

The ancient landscape at Yarrabubba preserves traces of the world’s oldest known asteroid impact. ShutterstockThe world’s oldest remaining asteroid crater is at a place called Yarrabubba, ...

Aaron J. Cavosie, Senior research fellow, Curtin University - avatar Aaron J. Cavosie, Senior research fellow, Curtin University

Scientists hate to say 'I told you so'. But Australia, you were warned

Without a radical change of course on climate change, Australians will struggle to survive on this continent, let alone thrive. AAP/Dave HuntThose who say “I told you so” are rarely welcom...

Will Steffen, Emeritus Professor, Australian National University - avatar Will Steffen, Emeritus Professor, Australian National University

The science backs Harry and Meghan turning in their royal privilege. Fame and fortune aren't the keys to happiness

If you’ve ever dreamt of fame and fortune, Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle turning their backs on the royal lifestyle might seem churlish. So too their desire to be “financially ...

Jolanda Jetten, Professor, School of Psychology, ARC Laureate Fellow, The University of Queensland - avatar Jolanda Jetten, Professor, School of Psychology, ARC Laureate Fellow, The University of Queensland

New year, new strategy? Unheralded change to budget targets creates space for stimulus

In public, the government is crab-walking away from its commitment to a budget surplus, saying since the bushfires that other things have become more important. Asked directly on Tuesday whether he w...

Danielle Wood, Program Director, Budget Policy and Institutional Reform, Grattan Institute - avatar Danielle Wood, Program Director, Budget Policy and Institutional Reform, Grattan Institute

I’m taking antibiotics – how do I know I've been prescribed the right ones?

Not all antibiotics kill all types of bacteria. fizkes/ShutterstockIn the days before antibiotics, deaths from bacterial infections were common. Seemingly minor illnesses could escalate in severity, b...

Christine Carson, Senior Research Fellow, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia - avatar Christine Carson, Senior Research Fellow, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia

Bushfire education is too abstract. We need to get children into the real world

Children and young people have been deeply impacted by the current bushfire crisis. Schools have been destroyed and thousands of houses have burnt down. Hazardous air pollution is causing major public...

Briony Towers, Research Fellow, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University - avatar Briony Towers, Research Fellow, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University

Juries need to be told how they're allowed to use the internet to ensure fair trials

We can't stop jurors accessing the internet, but we can educate them and encourage self-regulation. from www.shutterstock.comJuries are supposed to consider evidence without influence or bias from th...

Jemma Holt, Research Fellow/ Acting Executive Officer (Research), Tasmania Law Reform Institute, University of Tasmania - avatar Jemma Holt, Research Fellow/ Acting Executive Officer (Research), Tasmania Law Reform Institute, University of Tasmania

Sick and Tired of Your Dead End Job? Try Teaching!

Tired of the same old grind at the office? Want an opportunity to impact lives both in your community and around the world? Do you love to travel and have new experiences? Teaching English is the perfect job for you! All you need is a willingness to ...

News Company - avatar News Company

The Impact of an Aging Population in Australia

There’s an issue on the horizon that Australia needs to prepare for. The portion of elderly citizens that make up the country’s overall population is increasing, and we might not have the infrastructure in place to support this. Australians h...

News Company - avatar News Company