• Written by Peter Saunders, Research Professor in Social Policy, UNSW
Every reference but one to inequality nearly doubling was removed from an Australian Institute of Health and Welfare report. Shutterstock

First it was the Bureau of Statistics. It produced an notoriously bland press release headed “Inequality stable since 2013-14” when its own analysts had told it there had been a “significant increase” in wealth inequality since 2011–12, that wealth inequality was “at its peak” since it was first measured, and that there had been “a significant downward change” in the wealth share of the bottom fifth of Australian households.

The analyst who penned the note about the significant downward change added, in what appears to have been a plea for guidance: “I’m not sure that we want to draw attention to this though??”.

We know this only because of emails released by the Bureau of Statistics in response to a Freedom of Information request.

Christopher Sheil and Frank Stilwell drew attention to it in The Conversation and then went on to suggest that the Productivity Commission might have also been downplaying the growth in wealth inequality by producing its own bespoke measure at odds with others.


Read more: It's not just the ABS. It's also the Productivity Commission downplaying the growth in inequality


I am not convinced that the Productivity Commission did downplay the growth in wealth inequality, but that doesn’t mean sensitivity about inequality isn’t widespread in official circles, apparently including, as I will outline, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

First, the Productivity Commission.

Sheil and Stilwell present a chart showing the Commission’s 2017 report to be “the odd man out” among five studies – the only one to show a decline in the share of wealth going to the top 10% between 2013-14 and 2015-16.

Productivity Commission understandable

But on the graph presented by the Productivity Commission itself the decline is miniscule.

The PC study also measured a different thing to the other studies: so-called equivalised wealth, which is wealth adjusted for household size and composition.

This isn’t the place to argue the merits of the PC approach (I have problems with it), merely to note that if the PC’s findings were substantially different from other findings, it might be because it was measuring something different.


Read more: Inequality is growing, but it is also changing as Australia's super rich evolve


This isn’t the case for what happened two years ago at the government-funded Australian Institute for Health and Welfare.

Institute for Health and Welfare inexplicable

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

Every two years since 1993 the AIHW has produced a report that presents reliable and detailed information about the need for and provision of welfare services such as aged care, child care, education, housing and disability services.

Every two years since 1993 the Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (AIHW) has produced a report that presents reliable and detailed information about the need for and provision of welfare services such as aged care, child care, education, housing and disability services.

I was involved in early discussions about the structure and content of Australia’s Welfare and have been asked (with others) to comment on draft chapters prior to release. In 1999 I contributed a chapter. I spoke at its launches in 1997 and 2005. I am a strong supporter of the AIHW and of its work.

In recent years it has added an overview of Australia’s welfare progress over a wide range of dimensions using a framework that covers 15 key indicators divided into seven themes.

It summarises recent changes in each indicator and indicates whether they are, on balance, favourable or unfavourable, or whether there has been no change or no clear trend.

Australia's Welfare 2017, table 9.2.2

One of the themes is material living conditions. The second of its three indicators is income inequality.

"Errata Slip", AIHW

Table 9.2.2 summarises the changes between 2003-04 and 2013-14 as “unfavourable”.

Yet when I received my hard copy of that report in mid-November 2017, I was surprised to find a loose-leaf insert inside the front cover headed “Errata slip,” dated October 11, 2017.

An errata is usually a list of factual errors and corrections.

This one dealt not with factual errors but contained what were essentially three changes to the way in which income inequality was described, all of them the same.

In each case a phrase like this was removed

The difference between household income levels in the highest and lowest income quintiles has nearly doubled from 1994-95 to 2013-14

and replaced by one like this

While the distribution of income in Australia has shown little change in recent years, income inequality has risen since the mid-1990s as measured by the Gini coefficient.

Each quintile contains one-fifth of the population, where the top quintile contains those with the highest incomes and the bottom contains those with the lowest incomes.

The statement that has been replaced is correct. The difference between household income levels in the highest and lowest income quintiles had nearly doubled between 1994-95 and 2013-14.

But it has been expunged from the version of the report that can be downloaded from the AIHW website, even though careful readers will note that one instance of it still survives unexpurgated on page 355.

The one that got away, marked in yellow. Australia's Welfare 2017, page 355

The changes struck me as weird at the time.

Errata are normally reserved for correcting or removing gross errors of fact discovered after printing. In this case, the changes simply replaced a factually correct statement of what the data showed (that income inequality had gone up substantially) with one that was far more qualified.

I find it inconceivable that those responsible for producing such a well-researched, meticulously-checked, authoritative and extensively assessed (internally and externally) report would, at this very late stage, have decided to insist on the change themselves.


Read more: Don't believe what they say about inequality. Some of us are worse off


So did the Institute give in to external pressure to conform and fall in behind the (incorrect) government line that income inequality hasn’t grown? It’s hard to think of another explanation.

If this is the case, what the Institute did is made it easier for the Bureau of Statistics to dilute the message of its own statistics two years later.

Even stranger still…

One of the most bizarre aspects of this whole episode is that the current government has been actively pursuing policies designed to increase inequality – at least in the short-run – through substantial tax cuts for those at the top, and resistance to raising Newstart for those at the bottom.

Both have been justified on the grounds that widening income gaps will increase incentives to work and save and encourage more Australians to “have a go”.

It thus seems odd for the government to try to suppress or alter information that shows two of its policies working as planned, if that’s what’s happened here.


Read more: There's a reason you're feeling no better off than 10 years ago. Here's what HILDA says about well-being


We need reliable and accurate data on inequality in order to monitor all aspects of our progress and tell whether programs are working as intended. Massaging presentations to make it look as if less is happening than actually is doesn’t serve public policy well.

The agencies that provide this data must abide by the strongest possible standards to ensure the integrity of their data. As far as is known, they do. But those standards have to extend to the presentation of their data. Without that, we will become less than we are, and we will have less idea of what we are doing.

Peter Saunders receives funding from the Australian Research Council. We has, in the past, conducted research on commission to, or in collaboration with, both the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. He is currently the academic lead of the ACOSS/UNSW Poverty and Inequality Partnership.

Authors: Peter Saunders, Research Professor in Social Policy, UNSW

Read more http://theconversation.com/another-official-australian-report-has-been-doctored-to-gloss-over-rising-inequality-123091

How to effectively increase your sales

We are living in a digital age where we are more exposed to media such as television channels, internet mediums. All of us have Facebook, Instagram, etc. companies now are targeting different medium...

News Company - avatar News Company

8 benefits of early childhood learning

Early childhood education aims to build the foundation of learning. Parents usually enroll their children in preschools or daycare centers to carry out their job responsibilities. Some send their ch...

News Company - avatar News Company

Scott Morrison's 'resilience' speech overshadowed as McKenzie crisis deepens

Sport Australia wrote to McKenzie's office before the election expressing concern it was being compromised by political interference. Scott Morrison will use his first major 2020 speech to press his p...

Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra - avatar Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

The US presidential primaries are arcane, complex and unrepresentative. So why do Americans still vote this way?

Like the other Democratic candidates for president, Elizabeth Warren has spent months canvassing Iowa to meet voters while spending little time in other states. CJ Gunther/EPAWhile political parties i...

David Smith, Senior Lecturer in American Politics and Foreign Policy, US Studies Centre, University of Sydney - avatar David Smith, Senior Lecturer in American Politics and Foreign Policy, US Studies Centre, University of Sydney

Marketing, not medicine: Gwyneth Paltrow’s The Goop Lab whitewashes traditional health therapies for profit

Netflix's new show fails to critically explore the alternative therapies it promotes. Adam Rose/NetflixIn Gwyneth Paltrow’s new Netflix series, The Goop Lab, Paltrow explores a variety of wellne...

Nadia Zainuddin, Senior Lecturer, University of Wollongong - avatar Nadia Zainuddin, Senior Lecturer, University of Wollongong

Not all Australian parents can access quality childcare and preschool – they can't just 'shop around'

Governments spend less than half the amount per child in early childhood education compared to what they spend per child in school. from shutterstock.comMany providers of early childhood education and...

Kate Noble, Education Policy Fellow, Mitchell Institute, Victoria University - avatar Kate Noble, Education Policy Fellow, Mitchell Institute, Victoria University

How to cope with extreme heat days without racking up the aircon bills

Even without air conditioning, there are still many things you can do to prepare for extreme heat and stay comfortable on hot days. fizkes/ShutterstockSummer in Australia is getting hotter. Extreme he...

Emma Power, Senior Research Fellow, Geography and Urban Studies, Western Sydney University - avatar Emma Power, Senior Research Fellow, Geography and Urban Studies, Western Sydney University

Seniors struggle with technology, and often their kids won't help

Many older people are wary of asking for help with technology. ShutterstockSeniors may not enjoy the stereotype of struggling with technology, but undeniably many older people do have difficulty maste...

Bernardo Figueiredo, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, RMIT University - avatar Bernardo Figueiredo, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, RMIT University

How contagious is the Wuhan coronavirus and can you spread it before symptoms start?

Cases of the Wuhan coronavirus have increased dramatically over the past week, prompting concerns about how contagious the virus is and how it spreads. According to the World Health Organisation, 16-...

C Raina MacIntyre, Professor of Global Biosecurity, NHMRC Principal Research Fellow, Head, Biosecurity Program, UNSW - avatar C Raina MacIntyre, Professor of Global Biosecurity, NHMRC Principal Research Fellow, Head, Biosecurity Program, UNSW

Sick and Tired of Your Dead End Job? Try Teaching!

Tired of the same old grind at the office? Want an opportunity to impact lives both in your community and around the world? Do you love to travel and have new experiences? Teaching English is the perfect job for you! All you need is a willingness to ...

News Company - avatar News Company

The Impact of an Aging Population in Australia

There’s an issue on the horizon that Australia needs to prepare for. The portion of elderly citizens that make up the country’s overall population is increasing, and we might not have the infrastructure in place to support this. Australians h...

News Company - avatar News Company