• Written by Jemma Holt, Research Fellow/ Acting Executive Officer (Research), Tasmania Law Reform Institute, University of Tasmania
We can't stop jurors accessing the internet, but we can educate them and encourage self-regulation. from www.shutterstock.com

Juries are supposed to consider evidence without influence or bias from the outside world. However, the widespread access to and use of the internet and social media threatens to undermine this, with significant consequences for our criminal justice system and those within it.

Given courts cannot effectively police smart-phone use they must adapt to it. This week the Tasmania Law Reform Institute completed its year long inquiry into courts and the information age, and has recommendations as to how they can adapt.


Read more: Jurors and social media: is there a solution?


The right to a fair & unbiased trial by your peers

An accused person’s right to a fair trial is the most fundamental principle of our criminal justice system. It is a phrase that describes a system that affords an accused person many protections. That system relies on jurors being impartial and returning a verdict that is based solely on the evidence that is presented within the courtroom.

In the past this was readily easy to achieve. Juror communications during trial hours and even after them could be controlled. News about the trial was generally a local affair, and even when it attracted national attention, the journalists needed to be in the court’s jurisdiction to report, so they and their employers were subject to the court’s authority.

The shift in the way people access news, information and communications in the modern age has changed this reality.

Almost every Australian has access to the internet via their smartphone or other devices, social media use is habitual among much of our population, and the internet is a ubiquitous source of information for most people.

Jurors are no different – in fact, they represent the wider Australian community these statistics describe. While jurors’ smart phones are removed from them during trial, they cannot be before or after the trial period, nor at the beginning or end of the day. As a result jurors may intentionally, or simply by habit seek out or communicate information about the trial.


Read more: All about juries: why do we actually need them and can they get it 'wrong'?


Use and misuse of social media

Between 2018 and 2020 the Tasmanian Law Reform Institute conducted an inquiry into juror misuse of the internet and social media during trials. The institute concluded there is likely to be a high, but unquantifiable and undetectable level of misuse.

However, there is evidence across Australian jurisdictions that jurors have used their internet connected devices to:

  • research legal terms or concepts or other information relevant to the trial. A West Australian juror in a drug-related trial obtained information online about methylamphetamine production

  • research the accused, witnesses, victims, lawyers or the judge. Two South Australian jurors sitting in a blackmail trial against multiple defendants conducted online searches about the accused which disclosed past outlaw motorcycle gang affiliations

  • communicate with people involved in the trial. Multiple New South Wales jurors on a long-running fraud trial became Facebook friends, sharing posts such as a digitally altered photo of one of the jurors wearing a judge’s wig

  • publish material about the trial on the internet or social media. A NSW juror sitting in a sexual offending trial posted on Facebook the day before the guilty verdict was returned: “When a dog attacks a child it is put down. Shouldn’t we do the same with sex predators?” This post was accompanied with a photograph that showed images of rooms and implements by which lawful executions are carried out.

Misuse is under-reported. In those few instance where reports are made, fellow jurors, rather than court officers, tend to be the ones who raise the issue. Indeed, it is an important part of their role.

While jurors across Australia are currently told not to conduct online research, wilful disobedience is only part of the problem. It can also involve unintentional acts by jurors who believe they are doing the right thing.

For instance, jurors accessing online news, entertainment or social media sites can be passively influenced by information relevant to the trial. Jurors often misunderstand their role and conduct independent research in the genuine belief their actions are in the pursuit of “fairness” or discovering the truth.

What jurors see online could affect their choice in the courtroom. from www.shutterstock.com

Educate, inform & encourage self-regulation

The law reform institute ultimately concluded it is impossible for, and beyond the capacity of courts to completely police juror internet use. It has thus recommended not reforming the law, but rather strengthening and standardising juror education and directions. These recommendations are divided across two stages of jury selection, as part of an overall strategy:

  • pre-selection: prospective jurors should receive improved training and information about the role of the juror and the risks of internet use

  • post-selection: once a jury has been selected, judges need to explain to jurors what dangers arise from using the internet to access and publish on social media, seeking information about the case, parties, court officers, lawyers, and self-conducted research into legal concepts or sentences. The report has recommended the court adopt minimum standard directions, but also have the flexibility to make specific directions relevant to any particular trial.

The report recommended certain current practices and laws should remain unchanged, including:

  • removing phones from jurors while they are in court (even though the effect is limited it avoids juror distraction)

  • leaving contempt (punishment) laws in place for those jurors who intentionally ignore court training and directions. That might include monetary fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment.

This process is aimed at encouraging self-regulation among jurors, by educating them how to curtail their internet use and why it’s so important.


Read more: Trial by social media: why we need to properly educate juries


Jemma Holt receives funding from the Law Foundation of Tasmania.

Brendan Gogarty receives funding from Law Foundation of Tasmania.

Authors: Jemma Holt, Research Fellow/ Acting Executive Officer (Research), Tasmania Law Reform Institute, University of Tasmania

Read more http://theconversation.com/juries-need-to-be-told-how-theyre-allowed-to-use-the-internet-to-ensure-fair-trials-130127

THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN CHOOSING A CATERING SERVICE FOR YOUR WEDDING

Catering is a popular and sought-after service. Choosing a banquet hall for a wedding, you cannot compromise, for the sake of a beautiful interior, agreeing to a kitchen that does not suit you. Just...

News Company - avatar News Company

THE BEST DRINKS TO SERVE AT A PARTY

Whoever said throwing a party is a piece of cake probably forgot that the cake is just one thing off of the list for a party planner or a host. Planning a party is no easy feat. It might even take w...

News Company - avatar News Company

The Advantages of Bulk Purchase

Bulk purchasing is the process of buying a certain product in larger quantities to obtain the benefits of lower per-unit prices. Usually, companies buy raw materials in bulk to get economies of scal...

News Company - avatar News Company

Why Australians fell out of love with Holdens

Harrison Broadbent, Unsplash, CC BY-SAThe jingle used to tell us we loved “football, meat pies, kangaroos and Holden cars”. These days we love Japanese utes and small Toyotas, Hyundais ...

Gary Mortimer, Professor of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour, Queensland University of Technology - avatar Gary Mortimer, Professor of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour, Queensland University of Technology

Nearly 80% of Australians affected in some way by the bushfires, new survey shows

James Gourley/AAPLast month, the Australian National University contracted with the Social Research Centre (SRC) to survey more than 3,000 Australian adults about their experiences and attitudes rela...

Nicholas Biddle, Associate Professor, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University - avatar Nicholas Biddle, Associate Professor, ANU College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University

65,000-year-old plant remains show the earliest Australians spent plenty of time cooking

Researchers May Nango, Djaykuk Djandjomerr and S. Anna Florin collecting plants in Kakadu National Park. Elspeth Hayes, Author providedAustralia’s first people ate a wide variety of fruits, vege...

S. Anna Florin, PhD candidate, The University of Queensland - avatar S. Anna Florin, PhD candidate, The University of Queensland

Coles says these toys promote healthy eating. I say that's rubbish

ShutterstockAs a parent, I find it so frustrating to take my children shopping, reusable bags in hand, only to be offered plastic toys at the checkout. It’s an incredibly confusing message to b...

Carla Liuzzo, Sessional Lecturer, School of Business, Queensland University of Technology - avatar Carla Liuzzo, Sessional Lecturer, School of Business, Queensland University of Technology

Books in a post-f@#^ world. Are we all sworn out yet?

ShutterstockWarning: this piece features frequent coarse language that may offend some readers. Since Adam Mansbuch’s 2011 bestseller, Go the Fuck to Sleep, book titles have been swearing prof...

Donna Mazza, Senior Lecturer in Creative Arts, Edith Cowan University - avatar Donna Mazza, Senior Lecturer in Creative Arts, Edith Cowan University

West Gate Tunnel saga shows risk of 'lock-in' on mega-projects pitched by business

Victoria’s government finds itself in a big hole with its West Gate Tunnel project. As diggers lie idle in a dispute over what to do with contaminated soil, it’s facing long delays and bil...

James Whitten, Ph.D Candidate, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne - avatar James Whitten, Ph.D Candidate, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne

Sick and Tired of Your Dead End Job? Try Teaching!

Tired of the same old grind at the office? Want an opportunity to impact lives both in your community and around the world? Do you love to travel and have new experiences? Teaching English is the perfect job for you! All you need is a willingness to ...

News Company - avatar News Company

The Impact of an Aging Population in Australia

There’s an issue on the horizon that Australia needs to prepare for. The portion of elderly citizens that make up the country’s overall population is increasing, and we might not have the infrastructure in place to support this. Australians h...

News Company - avatar News Company