• Written by Genna Churches, PhD Candidate, UNSW

After watching this year’s media raids and the prosecution of lawyers and whistleblowers, it’s not hard to see why Australians wonder about excessive police power and dwindling journalistic freedom.

But these problems are compounded by another, less known issue: police, and other bodies not even involved in law enforcement, have broad powers to access metadata. Each year, police alone access metadata in excess of 300,000 times.

Metadata has been described as an “activity log”: it’s the information that allows a communication to occur. Once, this would have been the address on the envelope. But modern telecommunications metadata consists of the time, date, duration, locations of a connection and more.


Read more: Infographic: Metadata and data retention explained


This year, fresh evidence revealed police accessed the metadata of journalists and 3,365 telecommunications users unlawfully.

And local governments and professional bodies – which were explicitly denied access to metadata in 2015 – have been accessing the same data under different legislation.

What’s more, Optus this year revealed it was granted an exemption from a requirement to encrypt retained metadata. This means the metadata they hold isn’t secure.

Metadata can reveal where you work, live, who you visit, who you communicate with. Glenn Carstens Peters/Unsplash

So why are so many agencies overstepping their powers? The obvious answer is, of course, because they can.

There’s little oversight and consistency in the current metadata regime. The system is spread across two separate pieces of legislation, enacted decades ago, with more than 100 amendments.

This leaves loopholes that various agencies and police exploit for accessing metadata and dodging safeguards.

Why should I care about metadata anyway?

These scandals surrounding the metadata regime have cast a shadow over the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security’s current review of the outdated laws.


Read more: Think your metadata is only visible to national security agencies? Think again


Metadata can reveal where you work, live, who you visit, who you communicate with and potentially reveal your plans by exposing websites you access.

Australian law considers metadata less important than “content” (the voice in a live phone call or message in an email).

So while intercepting a phone call or email requires a warrant, metadata is accessible without a warrant by law enforcement agencies and any other bodies the legislation authorises, such as local governments.

The Abbott-era metadata scheme limits press freedom

In 2015, federal parliament, as part of efforts to target terrorism, passed the metadata retention scheme used today, requiring telcos to keep metadata for two years.


Read more: Benign and powerful: the contradictory language of metadata retention


Attempting to address privacy concerns, parliament limited the types of organisations that could access the data and the specific types of metadata that could be retained (excluding web browsing histories). It also created “journalists information warrants” to protect journalists’ sources.

Despite evidence suggesting these limitations wouldn’t work in practice, the legislation was passed.

It committed Australia to a data retention scheme at a time when a similar scheme in Europe was ruled invalid for being incompatible with fundamental rights.

Confusing laws mean safeguards don’t work

Law enforcement and intelligence agencies should have access to metadata, but the current system does not strike the right balance between privacy and law enforcement.

The gaps between the two laws that regulate the scheme allow the agencies and police to exploit them for their own purposes.

The first act, originally enacted in 1979 and amended at least 105 times over the last 40 years, was originally drafted to permit telephone intercepts.

The second act, Telecommunications Act 1997 originally contained provisions permitting access to metadata. But some elements were transferred to the 1979 act, leaving a broken and contradictory system of access and loopholes spread across the legislation.


Read more: Australian metadata laws put confidential interviews at risk, with no protections for research


These “logistical” issues result in a metadata access and retention scheme with very few safeguards.

Other safeguards are flawed: access to a journalist’s metadata under a “journalist information warrant” doesn’t actually protect sources, especially since the Public Interest Advocate isn’t bound to make a submission.

And others were deemed unnecessary, like restrictions on access to a lawyer’s metadata, despite professional secrecy obligations; or a requirement beyond a “self-authorisation” to access metadata in general.

So, what should we do to fix the Australian system?

Put simply, Australian communications have changed, so our metadata access laws need to change too. We can start by recognising modern metadata retention and access has large scale privacy implications, surpassing those surrounding telephone intercepts.

We need to assess those implications based on what metadata – now collected and processed via very different technologies – can reveal.

Accessing particularly sensitive types of metadata should require a judicial warrant and an investigation of a sufficiently serious offence that leads to imprisonment.

On the other hand, access to subscriber details, such as name and address, may be available under a less rigorous system of access, but still must be more restricted than the current regime. Even name and address information can be open to abuse.


Read more: Explainer: how law enforcement decodes your photos


Past parliamentary inquiries and reviews held throughout 2000s and 2010s have recommended a complete reform of the metadata regime. But these calls have gone unanswered.

We hope the current review also recommends a complete overhaul. A new review to redesign the scheme should be commissioned as soon as possible.

Above all, the government should consider the impact of such system on human rights. Australians deserve to know that access to their metadata is limited, and that metadata access will not be used to prosecute whistle-blowers and journalists for doing their jobs.

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Authors: Genna Churches, PhD Candidate, UNSW

Read more http://theconversation.com/unlawful-metadata-access-is-easy-when-were-flogging-a-dead-law-127621

Yes, this continent was invaded in 1788 – an international law expert explains

Should we remember January 26 1788 as “Invasion Day”? The colonisation of Australia was an invasion from an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspective. But critics of the name &ld...

Rowan Nicholson, Associate Lecturer and Co-director of the Sydney Centre for International Law, University of Sydney - avatar Rowan Nicholson, Associate Lecturer and Co-director of the Sydney Centre for International Law, University of Sydney

29,000 cancers overdiagnosed in Australia in a single year

Men are 17% more likely to be diagnosed with cancer than they were 30 years ago. fizkes/ShutterstockAlmost one in four cancers detected in men were overdiagnosed in 2012, according to our new research...

Alexandra Barratt, Professor of Public Health, University of Sydney - avatar Alexandra Barratt, Professor of Public Health, University of Sydney

How a year of trying to buy nothing made me a smarter shopper and a better teacher

Year 7 students at the International School of Helsinki, Finland, doing a sustainable development exercise with the author (top left) and fellow teacher Rachael Thrash. Katja Lehtonen, Author provided...

Ellen Heyting, PhD student in Education and Head of Years 11 and 12, Monash University - avatar Ellen Heyting, PhD student in Education and Head of Years 11 and 12, Monash University

10½ commandments of writing

Things to keep in mind for writers young and old. Kenny Luo/UnsplashEvery author is asked by new writers for advice. There is, however, no all-encompassing, single answer that also happens to be corre...

Sean Williams, Lecturer, Flinders University - avatar Sean Williams, Lecturer, Flinders University

How smart were our ancestors? Turns out the answer isn't in brain size, but blood flow

Skulls hold clues to intelligence. (Clockwise from left: Australopithecus, orangutan, gorilla, chimpanzee) Roger Seymour, Author providedHow did human intelligence evolve? Anthropologists have studied...

Roger S. Seymour, Professor Emeritus of Physiology, University of Adelaide - avatar Roger S. Seymour, Professor Emeritus of Physiology, University of Adelaide

The Wuhan coronavirus is now in Australia – here's what you need to know

New South Wales Health has confirmed three men in their 30s, 40s and 50s in Sydney have tested positive to the new Wuhan coronavirus after returning from China. This follows Australia’s first c...

Sanjaya Senanayake, Associate Professor of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Physician, Australian National University - avatar Sanjaya Senanayake, Associate Professor of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Physician, Australian National University

The best recipes for gin drink from around the world

Gin is a very interesting drink to explore. Gin is a surprisingly versatile drink when it comes to the flavor profile and can have different ranges of flavor profile when trying out different brands...

News Company - avatar News Company

The Most In-Demand Jobs for 2020

When choosing their career, a lot of people focus exclusively on the paycheck; however, this is definitely not all that matters. Whether or not a profession is in-demand will certainly affect the ...

Diana Smith - avatar Diana Smith

4 Ways Art and Creativity Raises Satisfied Children

Sydney is more than the Opera House, countless bars, and the harbour. Around it is the many suburbs that are excellent places to raise a family. From Hunters Hill to Gladesville, these areas offer...

News Company - avatar News Company

Sick and Tired of Your Dead End Job? Try Teaching!

Tired of the same old grind at the office? Want an opportunity to impact lives both in your community and around the world? Do you love to travel and have new experiences? Teaching English is the perfect job for you! All you need is a willingness to ...

News Company - avatar News Company

The Impact of an Aging Population in Australia

There’s an issue on the horizon that Australia needs to prepare for. The portion of elderly citizens that make up the country’s overall population is increasing, and we might not have the infrastructure in place to support this. Australians h...

News Company - avatar News Company