• Written by Apo Aporosa, Post-doctoral research fellow, University of Waikato
Australia allows travellers to bring in two kilograms of kava per person, but the government is considering doubling that to four. Todd Henry, CC BY-ND

The Australian government is considering an increase in the amount of kava travellers can bring into the country. The consultation process includes a proposed pilot program to ease restrictions on kava importation for personal use from two to four kilograms per person.

Many Australian residents, especially those with Pacific Island heritage, will welcome this, but the proposal is based on fundamentally flawed evidence.

In submissions to Australia’s Office of Drug Control, the governments of Fiji and Vanuatu have argued that significantly higher amounts should be allowed.

Australia’s restrictions on kava are based on concerns about its misuse in remote communities. But the government’s policy is imperialistic and ignores evidence about kava use, side effects and cultural significance.


Read more: Words from Arnhem land: Aboriginal health messages need to be made with us rather than for us


Kava: the sociable drink

Kava (Piper methysticum) is widely cultivated by Pacific Island communities for its root, which is ground up and mixed with water to make a beverage for ceremonies and other cultural settings.

Kava contains kavalactones, psychoactive ingredients that create a relaxed yet clear-headed state in the drinker. Unlike alcohol, it does not cause marked euphoria or lead to emotional changes, such as disinhibition. It is also not addictive.

Many Pacific Island communities now produce a powdered form of the root, which is exported for medical and social purposes all over the world.

Australian regulations on kava date from 1997, when a 2kg limit was introduced on the amount of kava passengers could bring into Australian without a permit. In 2007, a complete ban on kava was introduced in the Northern Territory. The 2kg limit remains in other parts of Australia.

Controlling kava

The government’s move to regulate kava followed “concerns” about kava abuse within Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory. Kava was originally introduced into these communities in the 1980s as part of a suite of measures aimed at reducing the harm caused by alcohol.

Opinion pieces published following kava’s introduction referred to all-night binges and illicit mixing of alcohol and kava. The government seized on this as grounds for introducing the Northern Territory ban, despite a lack of coherent evidence to support the reports, and praise for kava’s role in reducing alcohol-related violence.

This imperialistic policy has continued, with widespread negative consequences. Reports show that the inability to access kava has led to substance switching, with far more serious drugs being used instead.

This has affected the Aboriginal communities the restrictions were designed to protect as well as Pacific Island communities throughout Australia. For them, kava is more than a pleasant drink.


Read more: Ken Wyatt faces challenges – and opportunities – as minister for Indigenous Australians


Flawed consultation process

It is concerning that the flawed understanding that underpinned the introduction of Australia’s kava regulations persists in the current pilot program. This is evident in the information put forward for consultation and in the proposed changes.

The consultation is being couched as recognition of “the cultural and economic importance of kava to Pacific Islanders”, but health and social impacts of kava continue to be misrepresented. Examples include frequent references to kava having toxic health effects. Such claims of toxicity have been refuted recently and demonstrate an entrenched lack of understanding of alternative cultural perspectives.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has found, as recently as 2016, that both research and historical evidence show that:

It is possible for kava beverage to be consumed with an acceptably low level of health risk.

Similarly, the characterisation of the “dry and scaly skin” that can follow kava consumption as a “toxic effect” is misplaced. Kava dermopathy is a common and well understood side effect of prolonged kava use. It is known to be harmless and reversible. Some Pacific people see it as a positive demonstration of the individual’s engagement with their culture.

The unnecessary linking of kava dermopathy with toxicity shows that the attitudes and policy that underpin the consultation continue to be culturally skewed, based on outdated understanding of kava’s cultural significance.

Kava as culture, identity

This lack of understanding is most evident in the section dealing with “social impacts of kava use”. The first matter discussed refers to illicit markets for kava and their adverse community impacts. This maintains the negative connotations of kava.

Although kava’s ability to promote “fellowship and companionship” is mentioned, it is followed by a reference to “relationship distress” through kava use. A large body of research demonstrates that kava is not addictive and that its psychoactive properties are neither hallucinogenic nor stupefying.

If people choose to spend their time drinking kava, it is exactly that: a choice. Some people choose to spend time on other recreational activities, including gaming, watching television and playing on their phones, and these choices may cause “relationship distress” as well, but it doesn’t make these activities ripe for regulation.

What the consultation fails to understand is that the significance of kava drinking in Pacific Island communities, wherever they are located, goes far beyond its social aspects. Kava represents an ingestible manifestation of culture and identity, considered by many to be transferring spiritual power. Particularly for diasporic communities, kava circles provide a cultural classroom where respect, language and traditions are taught and reinforced.

Turning kava into a scapegoat through unnecessary regulation has ongoing adverse impacts for Pacific and Aboriginal communities throughout Australia.

Apo Aporosa is funded by the New Zealand Health Research Council: Pacific - Sir Thomas Davis Te Patu Kite Rangi Ariki Post-doctoral Award.

Authors: Apo Aporosa, Post-doctoral research fellow, University of Waikato

Read more http://theconversation.com/australias-discussion-of-kava-imports-reflects-lack-of-cultural-understanding-115662

Moving House? Use This Checklist

There are few life events as exciting, stressful, and logistics-focused as moving house. Whether you’re moving across the street, across the country, or across the globe, preparation is your best ...

Samantha Ball - avatar Samantha Ball

Age is Just a Number: Four Keys to a Well-Lived Life

While playing rugby in University, the sideline smattered with dads, uncles, and old fellows always caught my eye. Invariably, they’d be downing a can of beer and jawing their mouths throughout ...

Ben Raskin - avatar Ben Raskin

340,000 Melburnians have little or no parkland within 5km of their home

Under the stage 4 restrictions enforced throughout metropolitan Melbourne, residents can exercise for one hour each day, within five kilometres of their home. While such restrictions are necessary to ...

Ali Lakhani, Senior Lecturer in Public Health, La Trobe University - avatar Ali Lakhani, Senior Lecturer in Public Health, La Trobe University

It could take 10 years to measure the impact of legalising weed – should New Zealand's proposed law be even stronger?

www.shutterstock.comThe referendum on legalising recreational cannabis use is just over a month away. Campaigns for and against the change are well under way. We’ve had expert reports from the ...

Chris Wilkins, Associate Professor of illegal drug research, Massey University - avatar Chris Wilkins, Associate Professor of illegal drug research, Massey University

overall presentations down but assault, DIY injuries up

ShutterstockCOVID-19 restrictions in Victoria have had a marked effect on how and where we spend our time. For many people, home has become the workplace, and for most school-aged children, home is al...

Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Associate Professor, Accident Research Centre, Monash University - avatar Janneke Berecki-Gisolf, Associate Professor, Accident Research Centre, Monash University

1 in 10 women are affected by endometriosis. So why does it take so long to diagnose?

ShutterstockEndometriosis is a debilitating, chronic condition that affects 1 in 10 women worldwide. It occurs when tissue which has similar properties to the womb lining, ends up in the body and atta...

Caroline Gargett, NHMRC Leadership Fellow and Head of Women's Health Theme, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Hudson Institute - avatar Caroline Gargett, NHMRC Leadership Fellow and Head of Women's Health Theme, The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Hudson Institute

Best Road trips Tours You Might Take in 2020/2021

You probably know that a great road trip provides the level of adventure and pleasure like few other things. Not only do you get a lot of freedom, but you might also realise that it’s much che...

Diana Smith - avatar Diana Smith

3 Fall Landscaping Ideas to Keep Your Yard Looking Good

The leaves are falling, which means your yard is a mess. Check out these 3 fall landscaping ideas to keep your yard looking good year-round. In about a month fall leaves will begin to cover your ...

Sarah Williams - avatar Sarah Williams

The Victorian government has allocated $60 million to mental health. But who gets the money? 

The second wave of the coronavirus and the resulting restrictions have impacted all Victorians. Many are struggling, but some are struggling more than others. In response to the increasing number of p...

Chris Maylea, Senior Lecturer, Law and Social Work, RMIT University - avatar Chris Maylea, Senior Lecturer, Law and Social Work, RMIT University



News Company Media Core

Content & Technology Connecting Global Audiences

More Information - Less Opinion